AMD® computers that provide unyielding performanceFrom gaming to business, AMD® processors power a wide variety of laptops, desktops, and AI. If you’re a dedicated fan of AMD processors, you can find a variety of HP computers that come equipped with the AMD processors including the Ryzen™, Quad-Core™, Hexa-Core™, and more. Superior laptops that come equipped with AMD processorsWhether you’re interested in a dedicated AMD Ryzen laptop or a simple AMD dual-core portable PC, HP® has a variety of options.Looking for an extremely budget-friendly, baseline laptop?
Get drivers and downloads for your Dell OptiPlex 9020 All In One. Download and install the latest drivers, firmware and software.
The is a straightforward, yet highly effective notebook that’s ideal for surfing the web or taking notes in class.Equipped with an AMD Dual-Core E2-9000e processor and an AMD Radeon™ R2 graphics unit, you can enjoy the performance and quality you’ve come to expect from AMD with this laptop.If you need something a little more standard in terms of performance and hardware, the comes with an AMD Ryzen™ 5 processor, AMD Radeon™ Vega 8 Graphics.This isn’t your ordinary AMD processor laptop; it comes with 8GB of memory and a 128GB SSD. Enjoy the power and durability that this AMD Ryzen laptop provides every time you fire it up for work or play.On the hunt for the best value AMD Ryzen Laptop? The comes with some remarkable hardware that won’t put a major dent in your budget. The AMD Ryzen 3 processor is small but powerful.
Additionally, this processor works in perfect harmony with the HP 17z’s AMD Radeon Vega 6 graphics unit.For serious business projects, the is one of the best AMD processor laptops on the market. Enjoy the lightning-fast speeds that come with the AMD Ryzen 7 and Vega Graphics while you game or put together a work presentation.This multi-core, multithreaded processor gives this PC everything it needs to take on multiple high-level tasks at once.
The 15.6-inch HP ENVY x360 boasts an impressive 10 hour and 30-minute battery life so you can go all day without needing a charge.Alternatively, the is an impressive PC as well, equipped with a Radeon RX Vega M Graphics unit with 4GB dedicated. If you would rather have the best of both AMD and Intel®, the HP Spectre x360 touch laptop is just what you’re looking for. AMD powered all-in-one PC’sTake the digital world by storm with the. This convenient, all-in-one PC comes fully loaded with an AMD Dual-Core A-Series processor. This extremely efficient, budget-friendly all-in-one PC is perfect for any home office, classroom, or small business.Combined with an integrated AMD Radeon R4 graphics component and 8GB of memory, this PC gives its user a versatile toolset to take a variety of complex tasks.If the HP 22-inch All-in-One doesn’t come equipped with enough power and capability, you can always upgrade. Step up to 16GB of memory, so your powerful processor has plenty of room to gallop.For a more powerful AMD all-in-one PC, consider the.
This touch screen desktop computer boasts a 23.8-inch diagonal Full High Definition (FHD) display.Whether you need a hardworking, capable desktop for work, play, or a bit of each, the HP Pavilion All-in-One provides all the components you need to take on any task.Enjoy the blinding speeds produced by this computer’s 12GB memory and powerful AMD Quad-Core A-Series processor. Plan to play a few of today’s triple-A (AAA) titles in your spare time on your PC? Its AMD Radeon R7 graphics card will give you all the graphics processing power you need to play at some of the highest settings. Game at the highest-levels with AMDSometimes, you just need a dedicated to get the most out of your experience.The is a beast of a gaming PC. The only thing more impressive than its stunning aesthetic is its hardware.Complete with an AMD Hexa-Core Ryzen™ 5 1600 processor and an NVIDIA® GeForce® GTX 1050 2G graphics component, reaching the top of the leaderboards and slaying dragons in high-resolution will be a walk in the park.Store bundles of AAA titles on this computer's 1TB hard drive and never worry about being weighed down with too many gigs of data.Looking for an AMD powered desktop that can be used for gaming and work? The strikes the perfect balance between both worlds.Its AMD Radeon RX 580 graphics units give you the capacity to play all of today’s AAA titles with buttery smooth ease, while the AMD Ryzen 5 1400 4-core processor provides this PC with impressive computing power for everything else.Complete with 8GB of memory and a 1TB HDD storage component, this desktop computer is sure to see you through any challenge or endeavor on the battlefield or in the business world.Keep in mind, though, your gaming experience won’t be anything special without an exceptional monitor. The is a Quad High Definition (QHD) display with a 1ms gray to gray rate.Own the most impressive gaming setup on the block when you combine this epic display with the HP OMEN Desktop 880.
Prices, specifications, availability and terms of offers may change without notice. Price protection, price matching or price guarantees do not apply to Intra-day, Daily Deals or limited-time promotions.
Quantity limits may apply to orders, including orders for discounted and promotional items. Despite our best efforts, a small number of items may contain pricing, typography, or photography errors. Correct prices and promotions are validated at the time your order is placed. These terms apply only to products sold by HP.com; reseller offers may vary. Items sold by HP.com are not for immediate resale. Orders that do not comply with HP.com terms, conditions, and limitations may be cancelled. Contract and volume customers not eligible.HP’s MSRP is subject to discount.
HP’s MSRP price is shown as either a stand-alone price or as a strike-through price with a discounted or promotional price also listed. Discounted or promotional pricing is indicated by the presence of an additional higher MSRP strike-through price.The following applies to HP systems with Intel 6th Gen and other future-generation processors on systems shipping with Windows 7, Windows 8, Windows 8.1 or Windows 10 Pro systems downgraded to Windows 7 Professional, Windows 8 Pro, or Windows 8.1: This version of Windows running with the processor or chipsets used in this system has limited support from Microsoft. For more information about Microsoft’s support, please see Microsoft’s Support Lifecycle FAQ at Celeron, Celeron Inside, Core Inside, Intel, Intel Logo, Intel Atom, Intel Atom Inside, Intel Core, Intel Inside, Intel Inside Logo, Intel vPro, Itanium, Itanium Inside, Pentium, Pentium Inside, vPro Inside, Xeon, Xeon Phi, Xeon Inside, and Intel Optane are trademarks of Intel Corporation or its subsidiaries in the U.S. And/or other countries.In-home warranty is available only on select customizable HP desktop PCs.
Need for in-home service is determined by HP support representative. Customer may be required to run system self-test programs or correct reported faults by following advice given over phone. On-site services provided only if issue can't be corrected remotely. Service not available holidays and weekends.HP will transfer your name and address information, IP address, products ordered and associated costs and other personal information related to processing your application to Bill Me Later®. Bill Me Later will use that data under its privacy policy.Microsoft Windows 10: Not all features are available in all editions or versions of Windows 10.
Systems may require upgraded and/or separately purchased hardware, drivers, software or BIOS update to take full advantage of Windows 10 functionality. Windows 10 is automatically updated, which is always enabled.
ISP fees may apply and additional requirements may apply over time for updates. See ADDITIONAL PURCHASE NECESSARY TO ENTER OR WIN.
ANY ADDITIONAL PURCHASE WILL NOT INCREASE YOUR CHANCES OF WINNING. Open only to legal residents of 50 US/DC, 18+. Void where prohibited. Multiple monthly entry periods apply. Ends 11:59:59pm PT on 4/30/20.
Limit one entry per product review by email invitation only. Subject to Official Rules. Sponsor: HP Inc., 1501 Page Mill Road, Palo Alto, CA.The personal information you provide will be used according to the HP.
Reddit user CarbonFireOC wasn't happy with the temperatures he's been seeing on his Radeon VII, and decided he wanted watercooling. Unfortunately, that early since product release no GPU waterblocks are available for the Radeon VII. What he figured out was that the waterblock of EVGA's CLC 280 all-in-one cooler will fit. This cooler, which is made by Asetek and licensed by EVGA is designed for Intel & AMD motherboards and many similar variants exist from vendors like Fractal Design, NZXT and others.While performing such a mod on a $700 graphics card is not for the faint-hearted, it shows that with a little bit of creative ingenuity you can achieve amazing results without wasting top dollar.His 24/7 stable settings on Radeon VII are 2122 MHz core, 1265 mV, and 1252 MHz memory, resulting in a 3DMark Firestrike graphics score of around 33,000.
Even at such a high voltage, the watercooling keeps temperatures very low at 40°C GPU, 60°C Hotspot. 1265mV sounds rather high.What's the power consumption like? Hotspot temp?
Logging temps in Battlefield 5, my hotspot is around 40C and temps in the 30C range. I was able to run a 2200Mhz 1310mV no problem. Just for giggles, I managed to play a round of BF5 at 2270Mhz. Now we have hit a package power limit of sorts, they don't go much above 40C GPU and 60C hotspot during a bench run.
It will hit 70C hotspot under a stress test though and needs another 50mV to stabilize it. This is a really good question, I don't have a meter on. We have hit a possible hardware power limit with the card. I can only guess its around 500W.
The registry powerplay table is set to allow 1000W, so I don't think the limit is there.Posted on Feb 18th 2019, 9:39. Hugh Mungus, post: 3996773, member: 172152'Maybe, but the clockspeeds aren't worth the power consumption. 1900MHz plus low temps would have been sweet though.Eh, power consumption for the high end cards are meh.
My RX Vega64 runs 1800Mhz just fine and while running F@H only uses about 190-200W while doing that. Gaming @ 1800Mhz uses about 260-270W.As for your comment directly- I agree there too. Plus it'd give you the ability to vent that heat right outside the case instead of keeping it tucked inside the case.They can do an AIO version. Vega64 and Fury X proved it.
I doubt any other AIB will do it. So AMD needs to step to the plate and actually do it.Posted on Feb 18th 2019, 12:02. Londiste, post: 3996733, member: 169790'The guy suspects (but has not measured) that card uses 500W if not more. This is twice the power consumption for extra 300MHz. This is pretty far on the steep upwards efficiency curve.AMD cards are much more overclock friendly than Nvidia cards, there are simply far less limits. Any Turing or Pascal card has a rather limited Power Limit range and basically a hardcoded Voltage limit around 1.09V. This will not get you far and subverting this is not trivial.It's not a voltage, but current limit, on Nvidia cards.
We dont know the real reason behind it but my best bet would be that the proces is not suitable for high current and it could burn the chip out (to put it simply).XXLAI, post: 3997003, member: 182013'why do you mod? Because it sucks the power like an thirsty elephant in africa. Just wait amd to make low power version, you won't die.I can't promise because all of the amd hardware sucks more power from the powersupply:)It really comes down to the workload. Amd has a different approach then Nvidia and the downside is that it consumes a bit more power. A TDP is simply a outer limit the card could use. Does'nt mean when your gaming it's doing the same. However, you have so many tools these days to make a card more efficient.
Click on Chill. Click a Vsync. And before you know your 180W TDP AMD Card is doing all of a sudden barely 100W and still spits out 75 frames per second with low frame times.Posted on Feb 19th 2019, 7:39.
Jism, post: 3997579, member: 91255'It's not a voltage, but current limit, on Nvidia cards. We dont know the real reason behind it but my best bet would be that the proces is not suitable for high current and it could burn the chip out (to put it simply).It is both. There are Temperature, Power and Voltage limit bits which do get triggered separately.Jism, post: 3997579, member: 91255'A TDP is simply a outer limit the card could use.
Does'nt mean when your gaming it's doing the same. However, you have so many tools these days to make a card more efficient. Click on Chill. Click a Vsync. And before you know your 180W TDP AMD Card is doing all of a sudden barely 100W and still spits out 75 frames per second with low frame times.That depends on point of view. Card going for the max possible frequency while staying under TDP should be the preferred approach for power and clock management.
Nvidia is currently doing it better than AMD.The few times I have tried Chill, it tends to either introduce judder/stutter when altering moving speed or does not give a large benefit. It is cool tech but not one I would prefer to use during gaming.Posted on Feb 19th 2019, 8:43. Jism, post: 3997579, member: 91255'It's not a voltage, but current limit, on Nvidia cards. We dont know the real reason behind it but my best bet would be that the proces is not suitable for high current and it could burn the chip out (to put it simply).It really comes down to the workload. Amd has a different approach then Nvidia and the downside is that it consumes a bit more power.
A TDP is simply a outer limit the card could use. Does'nt mean when your gaming it's doing the same. However, you have so many tools these days to make a card more efficient. Click on Chill. Click a Vsync. And before you know your 180W TDP AMD Card is doing all of a sudden barely 100W and still spits out 75 frames per second with low frame times.a bit more?
If you use nvidia-smi to decrease the power limit to the half, nvidia is still faster than 2x power consuming amd cards.Posted on Feb 19th 2019, 11:16. Enterprise24, post: 3997107, member: 137706'33K FS @ 2122 is very impressive. My 1080 Ti watercooled + XOC @ 2190 / 1600 is just a bit faster at 34.1KIf he try to bench at 2270 1.31V he will beat heavily OC 1080 Ti for sure. Not counting that performance from future drivers will widen the gap further.Looks like there is tons of OC potential on Radeon 7 if you can properly cool it. This remind me of Kepler days where you can squeeze 40-50% more performance from selected GK110 with watercooling.Since the PCB is on the high end- AIB partners just need to release Waterblock model or take their existing massive Air cooler and mount on VII, I think they can sell very well for $749 a card with OC potential of 2200Mhz core/1200MHz Memory with good normal noise levels.We need to remember that RTX2080 FE runs 1900Mhz AVG while gaming, so Radeon VII @1900MHz/1050Mhz will perform very nice without OC.Posted on Feb 19th 2019, 13:46.
Londiste, post: 3996733, member: 169790'AMD cards are much more overclock friendly than Nvidia cards, there are simply far less limits. Any Turing or Pascal card has a rather limited Power Limit range and basically a hardcoded Voltage limit around 1.09V. This will not get you far and subverting this is not trivial.In what respect? What I mean is, are we taking core and memory clocks or are we talking results in fps? From what I gave seen in TPus testing, of seven 'gamer model' 2080 Tis, the highest core or highest memory clocks do not correlate with the highest fps. And if that correlation isn't there, then what conclusions can be drawn from greater core / memory OC ability?The reason I asked is that there's one significant story that I haven't seen in print as yet regarding what we are seeing these days regarding the fps gains obtained in overclocking GFX cards. Starting with the 2xx series, AMD stared aggressively overclocking their cards in the box.
When the 290x came out, it was designated the new king. It lost the throne to the 780 Ti a week later. However, when both cards were manually overclocked, the 780 retained 2nd place and the 290x slipped to third. With the 980 Ti and Fury X looked competitive outta the box, but the 980 Ti OC'd 27-30% fps improvements above reference and the Fury X was in single digits. The 10xx series wasn't quite as OC friendly but still a large gap between the two camps.With the AIB 2xxx series cards, we are seeing much lower OCs both in how much more we get outta the box and how much more we get above reference.
The factory OC'd cards are gaining around 8% above their 'in the box' condition, same as the Radeon VII. We are also seeing the FE 'A series' GPUs being used as the new 'reference'. Compared to.that. reference, the AIB's typical gamer cards have ranged from 112.1% OC (EVGA X Ultra) to 116.5% (MSI Gaming X Trio). I couldn't help wondering whether with 2xxx, they mighta tweaked up the OCs a bit more than in the past given that the 1xxx to 2xxx improvements generation to generation were less impressive,Another thing that I found intersting was that in the OC test, the 8 cards tested, 7 fell into vendor's gamer line and 1 in the premium, 'bawlz to the wall' card. The 7 ranged rather tightly, from 218.0 fps OCd to 226.6. However the premium card (Lightning Z) jumped to 236.7.
I'm curious as to what's happening here, recent iterations of the Lightening, Classified and Matrix had fallen well short of expectations and Im curious as to what improvement(s) gets credit for that jump. It is wporth noting that all 7 'gamer' cards tested has Micron Memory (T61K256M32JE-14:A) which ranged from 2005 to 2065 OC'd (EVGA was only 1960) and the Lightnng has Samsung (K4Z80325BC-HC14) which hit 2090. The Lightning had an OC'd core tho of only 2100, Only 2 cards were lowewr.
The MSI Trio was 2085 and outside the Lightning had the highest OC'd fps; The EVGA X Utra was 1960 and finished last other than the FE.Posted on Feb 19th 2019, 15:33. John Naylor, post: 3997795, member: 156078'In what respect? What I mean is, are we taking core and memory clocks or are we talking results in fps?
From what I gave seen in TPus testing, of seven 'gamer model' 2080 Tis, the highest core or highest memory clocks do not correlate with the highest fps. And if that correlation isn't there, then what conclusions can be drawn from greater core / memory OC ability?In many respects.
But what he alluded to was that AMD cards don't really have a 'hard' power limit like NVIDIA cards do. For an nvidia card, power limit is usually not the worst problem, voltage limit is. Every Pascal and Turing card I've had is power limited at stock. Somewhere at 10-15% additional power limit they start becoming voltage limited. Even though you can increase power limit for example 30% you will not the full benefit as voltage limit cuts you down first.AMD has power limit that can be subverted but not voltage limit as such. It least I do not remember Vega having one and temperature/power is what remains the important limit.John Naylor, post: 3997795, member: 156078'With the AIB 2xxx series cards, we are seeing much lower OCs both in how much more we get outta the box and how much more we get above reference. The factory OC'd cards are gaining around 8% above their 'in the box' condition, same as the Radeon VII.
We are also seeing the FE 'A series' GPUs being used as the new 'reference'. Compared to.that. reference, the AIB's typical gamer cards have ranged from 112.1% OC (EVGA X Ultra) to 116.5% (MSI Gaming X Trio). I couldn't help wondering whether with 2xxx, they mighta tweaked up the OCs a bit more than in the past given that the 1xxx to 2xxx improvements generation to generation were less impressive,When it comes to Nvidia, Boost 3.0 and Boost 4.0 are a thing. Reference clocks are far below any clock a Pascal or Turing card does with reasonable cooler on it. To put it simply, cards will increase clocks until they hit one of the limits - temperature, power, voltage. Well, there is a max number of bins it can boost but that is generally enough to reach to 1900MHz and something else will limit it first.AMD has a boost system that is essentially similar.Posted on Feb 19th 2019, 15:53.
John Naylor, post: 3997795, member: 156078'We are also seeing the FE 'A series' GPUs being used as the new 'reference'. Compared to.that. reference, the AIB's typical gamer cards have ranged from 112.1% OC (EVGA X Ultra) to 116.5% (MSI Gaming X Trio).I am also wondering why in all reviews the Nvidia's 'RTX 2080 FE' is labeled as reference 'RTX 2080'?
Aren't FE models should be compared with AIB's OCed models? Also Vega VII look's worse vs 'Reference' RTX 2080 in graphs since it's actually OCed RTX 2080 FE that runs on 1900Mhz on AVG vs 17001800 on Nvidia Reference 2080 clock speed?Average gamer could think that by the graph Non-FE RTX 2080 beats Vega VII and so after looking Nvidia RTX 2080 page they will see that there is RTX 2080 FE with higher clock so it must be even better -right? Wrong!Also I see that Nvidia's RTX 2080 Founders Edition really boost very close to AIB's Extreme models so the benchmarks results are very close, so IMO NVIDIA is really competing it's partners.Posted on Feb 19th 2019, 16:50 1 to 25 of 26 Go to Page.